State v. M.C.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 Appellant M.C. was required to pay a victim penalty assessment as a condition of the order deferring disposition of his case under RCW 13.40.127. Another statute provides that a victim penalty assessment shall be imposed when “any juvenile is adjudicated of any offense in any juvenile offense disposition under Title 13 RCW” RCW 7.68.035(l)(b). Because a deferred disposition is not a “juvenile offense disposition,” the trial court lacked authority to impose a victim penalty assessment.
¶2 The State charged M.C. with second degree theft and second degree attempted taking of a motor vehicle…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. C.R.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. S.S.Y.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. SSYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. MohamoudCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. MOHAMOUDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011