Legal Opinion

State v. M.C.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 23, 2009No. 61164-0-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Appellant M.C. was required to pay a victim penalty assessment as a condition of the order deferring disposition of his case under RCW 13.40.127. Another statute provides that a victim penalty assessment shall be imposed when “any juvenile is adjudicated of any offense in any juvenile offense disposition under Title 13 RCW” RCW 7.68.035(l)(b). Because a deferred disposition is not a “juvenile offense disposition,” the trial court lacked authority to impose a victim penalty assessment.

¶2 The State charged M.C. with second degree theft and second degree attempted taking of a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. C.R.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. S.S.Y.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. SSYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. MohamoudCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. MOHAMOUDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API