Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salisbury v. Salisbury

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1990No. 89-476Published

1DissentZehmer, Judge

This is an appeal from an order granting the former wife’s motion to hold the former husband in contempt and an order denying the former husband’s motion to modify alimony and child support. Since I cannot discern the factual basis for the trial court’s decision with sufficient clarity to determine whether or not reversible error occurred, I would reverse and remand for more specific findings of fact. See Calhoun v. Calhoun, 554 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Strickler v. Strickler, 548 So.2d 740 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Clemson v. Clemson, 546 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Lee v. Lee, 544 So.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clemson v. ClemsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Eisner v. EisnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Strickler v. StricklerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Calhoun v. CalhounDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API