Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 4, 1992No. 76437Published

1DissentOpala, Chief Justice

This case is not about the status of the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land;1 not about the invalidity of law that is repugnant to the United States Constitution;2 nor even about this court’s power to invalidate constitutionally nonconformable law. The question before us is rather whether this court should free itself from the restraining hand of Thread-*19gill3 to now impose constitutional orthodoxy not only on law that is in force but also on an as-yet-unenacted measure in the political process of initiative lawmaking. To this question I would give a categorically…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API