O'Callahan v. Dermedy
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mttscatine District Court. — D. Y. JacesoN and William Theophilus, Judges. Appeal from an order by tbe district court affirming tbe. finding and order of tbe industrial commissioner in a Workmen’s Compensation case.
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
Tbe- appellee was employed as a nigbt clerk at tbe Grand Hotel in tbe city of Muscatine. Tbe 'employment covered a period from September 1, 1919, to January 2, 1921. Tbe appellee was engaged in bis duties from six o’clock P. M. until six o’clock A. M. every day, and was charged with tbe usual and ordinary duties of a clerk in a hotel. He is a man fifty-six years of age.
Upon tbe day in question, it appears that, shortly after appellee entered upon bis usual work, two or three men who were guests in tbe hotel complained to appellee of loud talk and noise that bad been made on an upper floor in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Reid v. Automatic Electric Washer Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Geyer v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Imhoff v. Chicago & Milwaukee Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
- Mitchell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Employment Commission v. Black-Foxe Military InstituteAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1941
- Haas v. Globe Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Marley v. Orval P. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Thibeault v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Clingingsmith v. Jackson Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.