Legal Opinion
East Side Mill Co. v. Feldman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions
From Multnomah: Heney E. McGinn, Judge. This is a suit by the East Side Mill & Lumber Company and the Portland Hardwood Floor Company, a corporation, against Ernest Feldman and Poldi Feldman, his wife, Frank Holten, ‘W. B. Starr, J. H. Fonner, the Laurelhurst Company, a corporation, to foreclose a lien. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin
1. This is a suit to foreclose a lien. The Portland Hardwood Floor Company answered, setting up its lien. The Laurelhurst Company filed a demurrer, which being overruled, the company answered. The case came on for trial, when the following occurred, according to the recitation in the decree:
“At said time it was stipulated and agreed in open court by and between said Lewis & Lewis, attorneys for said defendant and cross-complainant, Portland Hardwood Floor Company, and Hayes & Wangerien, attorneys for defendant Laurelhurst Company, that the defendant and cross-complainant, Portland Hardwood…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Rader v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Parker v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCargar v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Lengele v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1915