Seay v. Erwin

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. As the majority noted, the only changed cireumstances at issue are Katharine's income and her bi-polar disorder. The evidence established that Katharine had earned more than $17,000 in 2008 and was expected to earn more than $19,000 in 2004. But the evidence also showed that Katharine had also lost her full-time jobs at Ivy Tech and St. Vincent Clay Hospital for her errors in judgment and patient care mistakes, and she had been unable to maintain anything other than part-time employment since that time. The evidence also demonstrated that…