Legal Opinion
AAKJER v. City of Myrtle Beach
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 8, 2010No. 26825PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones
In response to various concerns stemming from motorcycle rallies, the City of Myrtle Beach enacted a number of ordinances and amendments to ordinances (the Motorcycle Ordinances). Among the ordinances was Ordinance 2008-64, which required that any person riding a motorcycle wear a protective helmet and eyewear (the Helmet Ordinance). Petitioners were each cited for violating the Helmet Ordinance by failing to wear the requisite helmet and eyewear. They brought this action in this Court’s original jurisdiction challenging the Helmet Ordinance on three points: (1) the Helmet Ordinance is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sangamo Weston, Inc. v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Spectre, LLC v. South Carolina Department of HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SANDLANDS C & D, LLC v. County of HorrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Ani Creation v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
- Red Bluff Trade Center, LLC v. Horry CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020