Warner v. Beebe
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. .Assumpstt. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Graves, O. J.
This litigation originated in conflicting ■claims to a quantity of saw-logs. They were cut by one Richard Nayler and the contending parties trace their respective rights to certain arrangements to which, as is said, Re assented. On March 7, 1879, he made a written agreement with Warner & Davis to' sell them the logs for $4 per M. feet delivered in the boom limits of Thunder Bay River *436Boom Co. — the logs to be scaled by Bichará Campbell in: the boom of the vendees — the latter to pay by their note of the same date for $200, due in three months — and their notes, running two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Osburn v. LovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Carpenter v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Randall v. HigbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rock v. DerrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ferguson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Flood v. ButzbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Sabo v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Hughes v. MichoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.