Carlisle v. Blackmon
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
This is a bill in equity by Mattie E. Car-lisle against G. F. Blackmon and wife, seeking to have a deed declared to be a mortgage and to be allowed to redeem the land in an exercise of the equity of redemption.
The trial court decreed the instrument to be a deed and not a mortgage. From that decree the complainant has appealed to this court.
Where, as here, the controversy is whether the parties contemplated an unconditional sale or a mortgage, the seller must show by clear, consistent and convincing evidence that it was intended by both parties that the conveyance should…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aiken v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Lindsey v. HamletSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Holman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Vickers v. McNealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Horn v. Dunn Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Cousins v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Wilfe v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Carter v. PaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970