Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Blackmon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1952No. 1 Div. 493PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a bill in equity by Mattie E. Car-lisle against G. F. Blackmon and wife, seeking to have a deed declared to be a mortgage and to be allowed to redeem the land in an exercise of the equity of redemption.

The trial court decreed the instrument to be a deed and not a mortgage. From that decree the complainant has appealed to this court.

Where, as here, the controversy is whether the parties contemplated an unconditional sale or a mortgage, the seller must show by clear, consistent and convincing evidence that it was intended by both parties that the conveyance should…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aiken v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Lindsey v. HamletSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Holman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Vickers v. McNealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horn v. Dunn Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Cousins v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Wilfe v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Carter v. PaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API