Legal Opinion

Criscenti v. Verizon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered November 13, 2009, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion to allow its deposition to be conducted in California by video conference, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion denied.

Respondent, a publicly traded corporation, with over 600 employees, has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that appearing in New York City for deposition would cause it substantial hardship (see Fortress Credit Opportunities I LP v Netschi, 59 AD3d 250 [2009]; Kenney,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fortress Credit Opportunities v. NetschiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Kenney, Becker, LLP v. KenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Swiss Bank Corp. v. Geecee Exportaciones, LtdaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API