Mosle v. The Sintram
District Court, S.D. New York
This wtts a libel by George W. Mosle and others against the ship Sintram to recover for loss of a cargo.
1Opinion of the Court
BilOWA, District Judge.
On the arrival of the ship Sin tram at this port on the 8th of January, 1894, with a cargo of nearly 28,000 boxes of tea from Hong Kong, some 800 or 400 were found to be wafer-stained on the outside so as to require reconditioning, and about as many more had the contents also somewhat damaged by sea. water, and were sold as damaged. The claimant pleads sea, perils, and the Harter act (Act. Feb. 13, 1893; 2 Hupp. Rev. Ht. 81), in defense.
The tea was stowed in the between decks. The damage was to the boxes along the sides of the ship, and is shown to have come from sea…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Edwin I. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- EJ DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Lawrence v. MinturnSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- The TitaniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- Philadelphia & R. R. v. The Allie & EvieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The British KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1898
- American Sugar-Refining Co. v. SandfieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1897
- Howell v. The Mary L. PetersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1895
- Grace v. The Mauna LoaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
- The Babin ChevayeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.