Legal Opinion

DeCandia v. Calamia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants, Randy Calamia and Janet Kelly Calamia, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated March 2, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion *437which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Randy Calamia.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Janet Kelly Calamia is dismissed, as she is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511; Carollo v Northern Westchester Hosp. Ctr., 5 AD3d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Comeau v. LucasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Kern v. RayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Carollo v. Northern Westchester Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Fantuzzo v. AttridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramcharan v. PariserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Sattar v. Natural Stone Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API