Legal Opinion
Melendez v. Dorville
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia A. Williams, J), entered February 23, 2011, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants failed to come forward with evidence to show that none of the injuries alleged in the bill of particulars could have been proximately caused or exacerbated by the infant plaintiffs elevated blood lead levels (see Bygrave v New York City Hous. Auth., 65 AD3d 842, 846-847 [2009]). In any event, plaintiffs raised triable issues of fact as to the cause and extent of the infant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Gulf Insurance v. Transatlantic Reinsurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Powell v. HIS Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bygrave v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Vazquez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scholastic Inc. v. Pace Plumbing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- A.L. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Dabbagh v. Newmark Knight Frank Global Management Services, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dabbagh v. Newmark Knight Frank Global Management Services, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Scholastic Inc. v. Pace Plumbing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015