Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Wohlgemuth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the Village of Seewen from certain portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Hew York county, entered in said SuTr.ogate’s Court on the 12th day of 'July, 1905, judicially settling and allowing an executors’ account and directing distribution of the fund in the hands of the said executors.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke,. J.:

Charles Wohlgemuth, the testator, died, at the German Hospital in Hew York city on August 20,1903, after a surgical operation on August nineteenth. On August eighteenth, the day before the operation, he made a holographic testamentary instrument. On the following day, August nineteenth, he made another testamentary instrument, also holographic. These two instruments were subsequently offered for probate as the last will and testament of the deceased, and upon such proceedings a decree was entered on the 2'Tth day of February, 1904,'in the Surrogate’s Court. By said decree it was “…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Newcomb v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. In re TildenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. In re the Estate of TildenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. SavageNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In re GaffneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Shea v. BergenNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API