State v. Polo

¶1 Pedro Enrique Polo appeals his conviction of possession of a stolen vehicle. In the first trial, a jury convicted Polo of possession of a stolen vehicle and driving under the influence (DUI). On appeal, the State *752conceded the conviction of possession of a stolen vehicle should be dismissed without prejudice. We accepted the State’s concession, reversed the conviction, and remanded.1 On remand, the State filed an amended information charging Polo with possession of a stolen vehicle. Over the repeated objection of the defense during the second trial, the court allowed the State to rely on…