Kreutz v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF DUBLIN
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ehankum, Judge.
It is apparent that in rendering the judgment on the condemnees’ application for distribution of the fund paid into the registry of the court pursuant to the award of the assessors and the judgment of condemnation, the court acted on the theory that the condemnor was concerned with the distribution of said fund. This was an erroneous theory. “Where the condemnor pays the amount of the award of the assessors into the registry of the court as provided by Chapter 36-11 of the Code, the condemnor is not thereafter concerned with its distribution. Code § 36-1113.” State Highway…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Highway Department v. HendrixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- State Highway Department v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- State Highway Department v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeKalb County v. Jackson-Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Fourth National Bank v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Housing Authority v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971