Legal Opinion

In re De Palma

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The co-committee has applied, pursuant to section 1375, subdivision 6, of the Civil Practice Act, for an order permitting him to deposit securities aggregating in value $18,000, and after such deposit reducing his bond by. that amount from $20,000 to $2,000. There are indications that a number of similar applications are being withheld pending determination of this motion. No question has been raised, respecting the conduct of this co-committee or the character or value of the securities here sought to be deposited. The only opposition is the surety company’s contention that judicial…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of BecanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. In re the Estate of DervinNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In re the Accounting of RossNew York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API