St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Millspaugh
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRADLEY,, J.
— For convenience we will refer to the claimant and the commissioner of finance as plaintiff and defendant.
Plaintiff had a demand against Thomas Egger, Private Banker, whose bank had failed, and sought to have this demand allowed as a preferred claim. The trial court denied a preference and plaintiff appealed.
The facts are as follows. Thomas Egger, Private Banker, conducted a bank at Lamar, Mo. May 13, 1924, plaintiff’s station agent at Lamar bought from Eggeri’s bank a draft in the sum of $221,.18 and gave cash therefor in the sum of $66 and the balance in certain checks which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stoller v. CoatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union State Bank v. Peoples State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Carson National Bank of Auburn v. American National Bank of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Miller v. Farmers Exchange Bank.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ronchetto v. State Bank of BevierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Turner v. Farmers Exchange BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.