Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Millspaugh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY,, J.

— For convenience we will refer to the claimant and the commissioner of finance as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff had a demand against Thomas Egger, Private Banker, whose bank had failed, and sought to have this demand allowed as a preferred claim. The trial court denied a preference and plaintiff appealed.

The facts are as follows. Thomas Egger, Private Banker, conducted a bank at Lamar, Mo. May 13, 1924, plaintiff’s station agent at Lamar bought from Eggeri’s bank a draft in the sum of $221,.18 and gave cash therefor in the sum of $66 and the balance in certain checks which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stoller v. CoatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. Peoples State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Carson National Bank of Auburn v. American National Bank of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Miller v. Farmers Exchange Bank.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Ronchetto v. State Bank of BevierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Turner v. Farmers Exchange BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API