Legal Opinion

Small v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The following opinion is the only paper in reference to this case which has come into the hands of the reporter.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court:

Redfield, Ch. J.

The exceptions in this case were allowed and signed by the two assistant judges of the county court in the absence of the presiding judge from the state.

"We are asked to dismiss them on the ground that they are not signed by the judge who presided at the trial. The statute of 1824, establishing the courts under the late system, which, so far as regards carrying cases to the supreme court, is the same as the present system, provided that “ all questions of law arising upon jury trials and placed upon the record by the allowance and order of any two of the judges…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mead v. Town of MoretownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  2. Holden v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Tucker v. YandowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  4. Gordon v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. In Re CarletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API