Bland v. Fessler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal the grant of summary judgment dismissing their action against the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission and the dismissal on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion of their action against the Attorney General of California. Plaintiffs’ action challenges on First Amendment grounds two California statutes that regulate Automatic Dialing and Announcing Devices (“ADADs”), machines that dial telephone numbers and deliver prerecorded messages. We affirm both decisions of the district court, but affirm the dismissal of the action against the Attorney…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pearson v. EdgarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Bland v. FesslerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Skinner v. Newmont Mining CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Skinner v. Newmont Mining CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019