Legal Opinion

Carter v. Wright

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

M. S. Carter and C. C. Carter, copartners, doing business under the name of Vehicle Supply Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, instituted an action of replevin in the circuit court of Alexander county against Homer L. Wright, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant.

The affidavit filed by plaintiffs in said suit averred that they were entitled to the possession of certain automobiles, which were specifically described, automobile parts, shop equipment, air compressors, drills, miscellaneous equipment, stock of automobile tires and tubes, desks, typewriters, filing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fougner v. First National Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Robbins v. LaswellIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. State National Bank v. ButlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Leeds v. TownsendIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Milligan v. MackinlayIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Marcus v. GreenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Drennan v. PeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Sternberg Dredging Co. v. Estate of SternbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API