Langston v. Hileman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
Appellant, one of two defendants, was on the losing side of a jury trial. His motion for a new trial, based upon juror misconduct, was denied by the trial court. Appellant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial. We agree with the appellant.
The facts of this case reveal that Wilbur and Peggy Hileman purchased a double wide mobile home from Big Three Mobile Homes, Inc. The home was manufactured by D.A. Langston, d/b/a D.A. Langston Enterprises (appellant). The Hilemans paid $32,904.38 for the structure. Shortly after the building was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Big Rock Stone & Material Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Ark. State Hwy. Comm. v. A. L. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Moody Equipment & Supply Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Franks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Koch v. Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.