Legal Opinion

Langston v. Hileman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1984No. 84-167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

Appellant, one of two defendants, was on the losing side of a jury trial. His motion for a new trial, based upon juror misconduct, was denied by the trial court. Appellant argues on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial. We agree with the appellant.

The facts of this case reveal that Wilbur and Peggy Hileman purchased a double wide mobile home from Big Three Mobile Homes, Inc. The home was manufactured by D.A. Langston, d/b/a D.A. Langston Enterprises (appellant). The Hilemans paid $32,904.38 for the structure. Shortly after the building was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Big Rock Stone & Material Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Ark. State Hwy. Comm. v. A. L. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Moody Equipment & Supply Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Franks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Koch v. Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API