People v. Harris

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting into evidence (1) photographs of the victim taken just after she was attacked, evidencing that she sustained a brutal beating and (2) a ripped and bloodied nightgown alleged to have been worn by the victim during the attack. This evidence tended to prove material issues in the case and was corroborative of the testimony given at trial (see, People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 369-370, cert denied 416 US 905; People v Baez, 131 AD2d 687; People v Shade, 127 AD2d 862, lv denied 69 NY2d 1009; People v Scott, 126 AD2d 582, 583, lv denied 69…