Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 12 opinions

. APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellant against the railroad company, to recover for stock killed%y the cars of the company at a point where the road was not fenced. Trial by the Court; finding and judgment for the defendant; a.motion for a new trial being overruled.

It appeared sufficiently that the cattle were killed by the cars of the company, and that the road was not fenced; hut the ground of the defence was that the road, at the time the cattle were killed, was being run and operated, not by the company or her servants, hut by a receiver appointed by the Circuit Court of the United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. FitchIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wall v. PlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Ryan v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Heath v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API