Legal Opinion

State v. Flanagan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 29, 1994No. 69,823PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

Defendant was charged with burglary and theft. He appeared before the trial court and requested an order appointing counsel to represent him on these charges. The trial judge told defendant that, under the applicable guidelines, he was not eligible for appointed counsel. Defendant continued to argue that he was unable to pay for retained counsel. As a result, he was adjudged to be guilty of contempt. He was later sentenced to time served on the contempt charge. Defendant then pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of attempted theft in a plea bargain that resolved the felony burglary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hendrix v. Consolidated Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. City of Overland Park v. BarronSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. State v. ZirkleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  5. State v. AlemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Harsch v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. DelacruzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API