Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with an attempted sexual act and an attempt to forcibly touch an employee after he tried to kiss a female staff member. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of attempted forcible touching. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crosby v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. McKinley v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Burgess v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Goberdhan v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Stanford v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Johnson v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Wells v. DubrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Matter of Wigfall v. Department of Corr. & Community SupervisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API