O'Connor v. Keiser
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DanTzrer, J., Abbeville, May, 1909. From order in case of D. P. O’Connor & Co. against Ed. Keiser, refusing to fix fee for E. L. Richardson, Esq:, for representing defendant Keiser, Mr. Richardson appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiEE Justice Jones.
In this suit W. A. McCord was appointed receiver df the assets of the defendant, Keiser.
The appellant was attorney for plaintiff and certain other creditors' of Keiser, was attorney for the receiver, and also claims to have rendered services as attorney for Keiser.
W. N. Graydon, Esq., then representing defendant Keiser, on April 30, 1909, gave E. L. Richardson, as attorney for plaintiff and the receiver, notice to dissolve the receivership and for an order “to take testimony as to what will be a proper fee for the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. Township of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Buist v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Park v. City of LaurensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Boyd v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Cauthen v. CauthenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wessinger v. SturkieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935