People v. Cuevas
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*1024OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
The court may upon application by the prosecutor exclude the public from a portion of the trial during the testimony of an undercover agent in order to protect the integrity of pending investigations, as well as the witness’ future usefulness, or to insure his safety from possible reprisals. The principles and procedures applicable to such a motion have been discussed at length in our prior decisions (see, e.g., People v Hinton, 31 NY2d 71; People v Jones, 47 NY2d 409).
Here the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. StantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. TolentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. CorderoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.