Lachine v. Manistique Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alger; Steere, J. Assumpsit by Abigail J. Lacbine against the Manistique Railway Company for services rendered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
Read the full summary
Error to Alger; Steere, J. Assumpsit by Abigail J. Lacbine against the Manistique Railway Company for services rendered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error. In August, 1894, the plaintiff undertook to keep the boarding house of the defendant at camp 1, under an arrangement whereby she was to run the boarding house, and receive for boarding the men in defendant’s employ $15 per month, which amount was deducted from the earnings of the men, and paid to the plaintiff each month, through the general office of the defendant. Under this arrangement she remained at camp 1 10…
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
(after stating the facts). This case is controlled by Bartlett v. Railway Co., 82 Mich. 658 (46 N. W. 1034), and authorities there cited. See, also, Forster v. Green, 111 Mich. 264 (69 N. W. 647); Goodson v. Detroit Board of Health, 114 Mich. 345 (72 N. W. 185).
Judgment reversed, and no new trial ordered.
The other Justices concurred.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bartlett v. Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Forster v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Goodson v. Board of HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. Onaway-Alpena Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917