Legal Opinion

Theros v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1965No. 10124Published

1Opinion of the Court

17 Utah 2d 205 (1965)

407 P.2d 685

CAROL J. THEROS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT.

No. 10124.

Supreme Court of Utah.

November 15, 1965.

Rawlings, Wallace, Roberts & Black, Warren M. Weggeland, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, Grant H. Bagley, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

CALLISTER, Justice:

Andrew James Theros made written application for a life insurance policy with defendant insurance company through its agent, William Homer George, on May 28, 1960. The policy was issued without…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Miller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  5. Prevete v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API