Legal Opinion

Spare v. Home Mut. Ins.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 28, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to Recover Damages on Fire Insurance Policy.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

The plaintiff, a citizen of Oregon, brings this action against the defendant, a corporation formed under the laws of California and doing business in Oregon, to recover the sum of $900 with interest since March 1,1882, on a policy of insurance for that amount against loss by fire. The case was heard upon a demurrer to the complaint. The question argued was, had the plaintiff an insurable interest in the property destroyed?

From the amended complaint it appears that on July 26,1881, Aaron and' Ben Lurch were partners under the name of “Lurch Brothers,” and q,s 'such, owned a lot in Gottage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rohrbach v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Herkimer v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Carter v. Humboldt Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spare v. Home Mut. Ins.United States Circuit Court · 1883
  2. Montgomery v. WhitbeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Spare v. Home Mut. Ins.United States Circuit Court · 1884
  4. In re CurtisDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1899
  5. Miller v. AhrensU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API