Legal Opinion
Barham & Arceneaux v. Kozak
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 2004No. 2002 CA 2325PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
874 So.2d 228 (2004)
BARHAM & ARCENEAUX
v.
Charles KOZAK and Mull & Mull (a Louisiana Partnership).
No. 2002 CA 2325.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
March 12, 2004.
Bruce S. Kingsdorf, Barrios, Kingsdorf & Casteix, L.L.P., New Orleans, for Plaintiff-in-Cross-Claim/Appellee Mull & Mull, A Louisiana Partnership.
Frank Tomeny, III, Jason L. Melancon, Tomeny & Fisher, Baton Rouge, for Defendant-in-Cross-Claim/Appellant Charles Kozak.
Before: PARRO, McDONALD, and CLAIBORNE,[1] JJ.
PARRO, J.
This case involves a fee dispute among multiple attorneys. An attorney appeals from a judgment dividing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- O'ROURKE v. CairnsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Hayes v. Louisiana State PenitentiaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Shannon v. VannoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Burns v. Interstate Brands Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Naquin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.