Legal Opinion

Clyde Jones v. City of Oakland

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 24, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00336Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLYDE JONES, Case No. 26-cv-00336-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND CITY OF OAKLAND, Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendant. The City’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. “A government entity may not be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, unless a policy, practice, or custom of the entity can be shown to be a moving force behind a violation of constitutional rights.” Dougherty v. City of Covina,

654 F.3d 892, 900

(9th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). Here, Plaintiff does not offer any non-conclusory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Dougherty v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Board of Trustees v. Gudgel Yancey Roofing Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API