Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Witte

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 11, 1981No. 61379Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMorgan, Judge

I agree that the record reflects that respondent, by negligence or otherwise, is guilty of “commingling” approximately $120 of his client’s funds with those of his own; and, that for so doing, he has violated certain Disciplinary Rules and should be disciplined.

However, I respectfully suggest that the outright disbarment ordered in the principal opinion is exceedingly harsh and not mandated by the facts of this case. As pointed out therein, we do in a disciplinary case reserve unto ourselves the power to review the same de novo and limit the findings of the Master to recommendations only.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re O'BrienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API