Legal Opinion
Denise v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 22, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order, dated May 7, 2007, reversed, without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.
Defendant New York City Transit Authority concedes that as a self-insurer, it is subject to the provisions of the No-Fault Law to the same extent as an insurer (see Insurance Law § 5103 [a]; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 321 [2]; Public Authorities Law § 1215; Dermatossian v New York City Tr. Auth., 67 NY2d 219 [1986]), and that actions to recover no-fault benefits are generally governed by a six-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 213 [2]; Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn, v…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Allstate Insurance v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- ELRAC, Inc. v. SueroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Glenwood Medical, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Spring World Acupuncture, P.C. v. NYC Transit AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
4Cited by2 opinions
- Denise v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Denise v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012