Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, in No. 15045 v. Volks City, Inc., in No. 15046
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant is engaged in the business of selling and servicing new and used automobiles, including Volks-wagens, in East Orange, New Jersey. Plaintiff, the manufacturer of Volkswagen vehicles, brought an action to re strain the defendant from trade-mark infringement and unfair competition. The main purpose of the action is to prevent defendant from holding itself out as an authorized franchised Volkswagen Dealer; no attempt is being made to prevent defendant from selling or servicing Volkswagen products. The parties agreed that the district court dispose of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glasco v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Edward T. Rickard, and Bessie Rickard, Individually, Etc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Stormor, a Div. of Fuqua Industries v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
- Glasco v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Dr. Ing. H.C.F. Porsche AG v. ZimDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.