Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ratliff v. Glanda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 22, 1999Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPeters, J.

I concur with that portion of the majority’s determination which found, contrary to Supreme Court, that petitioners alleged sufficient extraordinary circumstances to confer standing. However, as to that portion of the majority’s determination which found that the issuance of a final order of custody was properly premised upon a best interest analysis, I find the determination premature. Despite the characterization of the “Decision and Order” of Supreme Court as a final order of disposition, I believe that the disposition was, in effect, a temporary order of custody.

According to the “Decision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bridges v. HerticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API