Legal Opinion

Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. Cook

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from, Doniphan District Court. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff Cook, at the April term, 1887. The defendant Railway Company brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

On the 4th day of August, 1886, the plaintiff in error, by proceedings duly had; appropriated to its use as a right-of-way, “ so much of out-lot No. twenty-four, in the city of "Wathena, as lies within fifty feet on each side of the center line of said railway as now located.” A stream called Peter’s creek runs through this out-lot, and on the creek there is a small mill for making meal and feed, run *84by a Leffel turbine wheel. The mill is a frame building about fifty-six feet long and twenty feet wide, and the machinery consists of buhrs, bolt, sheller, and elevator. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mickel v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Morrell v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Beebe v. DosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulf R. R. v. OwenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Huff v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Anthes v. AnthesIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Crapster v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Graden v. MaisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API