Amos v. Gunn

*331On Eehearing.

Ellis, J.

Upon the first hearing in this case the court was divided upon the question, whether a bill duly passed by the legislature was required by the constitution to be signed by the presiding officers of the two Houses and respective clerks thereof, during the legislative session and by the legislature presented to the Governor. A majority of the court holding to the affirmative view.

There was no difference of opinion as to the mandatory character of the two provisions, one requiring all bids passed to be signed by the presiding officers of the respective Houses and by the…