Legal Opinion

Wills v. Pauly

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1897No. L. A. No. 157PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment, of the Superior Court of ICern County and from an order denying a new trial. A. ft. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff for the purpose of having it declared that defendant holds the undivided one half of a certain tract of land described in the complaint as the trustee of the plaintiff, and to obtain a conveyance thereof by defendant to plaintiff, and an accounting for rents and profits. The court below rendered judgment for plaintiff, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.

Respondent contends that upon this appeal nothing can be considered other than the judgment-roll, for the reason that the appeal from the judgment was not taken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Pryor v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Richardson v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Townsend v. TallantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Estate of BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Carter v. FrahmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. State ex rel. Schmidt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API