Legal Opinion

Bauermeister v. Tunison

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1959No. 6047Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion of the defendants-appellees, Clara E. Bauermeister, et al., seeking an order dismissing the appeal on law and fact for the alleged reason that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal in that this is not a chancery action.

The record reveals that the appellants, William E. Tunison and Mary *297E. Tunison, are lessees of real property owned by the lessors, Clara E. Bauermeister, et al„ appellees, and which was appropriated by the State of Ohio for highway purposes. The appropriation proceedings have been completed, and the sum of $20,000 has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbus v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API