Legal Opinion

Sellers v. City of Summerville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1954No. 35336, 35343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the defendant’s answer. Without going into detail, the answer denied that the plaintiff was entitled to recover on an implied contract, or a theory of unjust enrichment; and in elaboration of such denial it alleged that the benefits accruing to the city resulted from a policy of Georgia Power Company to offer such benefits to all the municipalities of Georgia, and that the services of the plaintiff were not the procuring cause of the benefits and had no connection therewith. Whitley v. Wilson, 90 Ga. App. 16 (81 S. E. 2d 877). The answer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. BoyettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Whitley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Sellers v. City of SummervilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Hinkle v. Smith & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Marbut v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piedmont Life Insurance Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. City of Summerville v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Piedmont Life Insurance Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API