State v. Tyrell Garrett McNeely
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to suppress. The district court in Franklin County granted a motion to suppress statements made by Tyrell McNeely to Detective Zane Jensen after finding that the Miranda warnings given to McNeely did not adequately advise him of his lights. On appeal, the State argues that the district court erred when it followed case law from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals requiring police to advise suspects of them right to have an attorney present during interrogation. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
McNeely was arrested…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Florida v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Michael NotiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PhippsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Berrett v. Clark County School DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MaximIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AlbertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MullinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.