Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1975No. 263Published

1DissentManderino, Justice

I dissent. For years the appellate courts of this Commonwealth have been saying that an order placing a criminal defendant on probation is interlocutory and need not be appealed at the time it is entered, but may be appealed at the time a sentence of imprisonment is imposed (if such a sentence is ever imposed). In Commonwealth v. Elias, 394 Pa. 639, 642, 149 A.2d 53, 54-55 (1959), we said such an order

“is a judgment from which the defendant may appeal . . . but it is not a sentence from, which he must ap*207peal within forty-five days after its entry, on pain of losing his right to appeal from a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VivianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TomlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. EliasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Trotter v. HendrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API