Legal Opinion · Dissent
Commonwealth v. Gilmore
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 30, 1975No. 263Published
1DissentManderino, Justice
I dissent. For years the appellate courts of this Commonwealth have been saying that an order placing a criminal defendant on probation is interlocutory and need not be appealed at the time it is entered, but may be appealed at the time a sentence of imprisonment is imposed (if such a sentence is ever imposed). In Commonwealth v. Elias, 394 Pa. 639, 642, 149 A.2d 53, 54-55 (1959), we said such an order
“is a judgment from which the defendant may appeal . . . but it is not a sentence from, which he must ap*207peal within forty-five days after its entry, on pain of losing his right to appeal from a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VivianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. TomlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. EliasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Trotter v. HendrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962