Legal Opinion
Barry v. Little
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1995No. Nos. 92-CV-1157, 92-CV-1448PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWERS, Associate Judge:
Plaintiffs,1 a class of District of Columbia residents receiving General Public Assistance (GPA) benefits on June 30, 1991 under the Public Assistance Act of 1982, D.C.Code §§ 3-201.1 to 3-221.1 (1988 Repl.),2 suffered the termination of those benefits when they were later found not to be “disabled” under D.C.Law 9-27,3 originally enacted as emer*117gency legislation, effective July 1, 1991, amending the 1982 statute. These terminations were to become effective at the end of the recipients’ current “certification period.” 4 The non-disability findings were made without any…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Shannon v. Commissioner of HousingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Shannon v. Commissioner of HousingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016