Legal Opinion
Egorov, Puchinsky, Afanasiev & Juring v. Terriberry, Carroll & Yancey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1999No. 98-31161PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants appeal from a summary judgment granted against them in their suit for, inter alia, tortious interference with a contract. Finding no error,. we affirm.
I
On May 15, 1996, the vessel M/V PAV-LOGRAD was seized pursuant to state law on behalf of an alleged creditor of the Baltic Shipping Company (“Baltic”), which owned the vessel. As a result of the seizure, the Russian crew of the vessel was constructively discharged from employment without payment of wages and other obligations.
On May 17, 1996, the Russian law firm of Egorov, Puchinsky, Afanasiev & Juring (“Egorov”), was engaged by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Dahlen v. Gulf Crews, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Mayor of Balt. v. BP P. L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Petrohawk Properties, L.P. v. Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Petrobras America, Inc. v. Vicinay Cadenas, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- In re Louisiana Crawfish ProducersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.