Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Smith

Licking County Municipal Court

Decided April 3, 1987No. 86-CVH-0679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrost, J.

This matter was commenced by the filing of a complaint on July 29,1986 wherein it was alleged by the plaintiffs, Carl E. Simpson and Terri Gatewood, that Timothy C. Smith, one of the co-defendants herein, had contracted to perform mechanical and body service on a 1965 Ford Mustang owned by the plaintiffs and that some work had been performed, but that defendant Smith refused to return the automobile to the owners without being first paid for the services rendered and that the automo*8bile was being wrongfully withheld. The plaintiffs further alleged that Smith, as well as co-defendants, Dale…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Market Development, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crye v. SmolakOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Garner v. Borcherding Buick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Renner v. Procter & Gamble Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Dantzig v. SloeOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API