Virginia Department of State Police v. Elliott
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
KELSEY, Judge.
The Virginia State Police appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that compelled, pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum, the production of a criminal investigation file for an in camera inspection by a deputy commissioner. The VSP claims the commission violated Code § 52-8.3, which makes it a Class 2 misdemeanor to disclose the contents of an “ongoing criminal investigation” under certain circumstances.
The VSP concedes, however, that it produced the subpoenaed file only after the criminal investigation had been officially closed. Still, the VSP reasons, we should…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Reston Hospital Center, LLC v. Karen Remley, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.A.P., etc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- William Scott Ingram v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- Pilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Bowden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Amanda C. Padula-Wilson v. Michael G. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.