Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1930No. 7787PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Does the petition set forth a cause of action which, if proved, *872would entitle the plaintiff to a recovery ? The demurrer was based upon the grounds that the petition does not allege that the plaintiff has title to the land described therein, and that the abstract of title attached to the petition shows a want of legal title in the plaintiff to the premises; that, while the petition alleges that whatever rights the plaintiff has in the property involved were acquired subject to the rights of the defendant under his purchase of the same from Heaton, it does…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peeples v. RudulphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Chidsey v. BrookesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Dugas v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Linder v. RenfroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Cherry v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tyler v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Bank of Tupelo v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Esprit Log & Timber Frame Homes, Inc. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Gray v. BradfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Bank of Tupelo v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API