Legal Opinion

State v. Lugojanu

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 11, 2018No. AC40691, AC40824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The self-represented defendant, Laurentiu Lugojanu, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Practice Book § 43-22. 1 The defendant claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion because (1) his sentence exceeded the statutory limit for a class B felony, (2) there was a disparity between his sentence and the sentences received by the other participants in the underlying crime, and (3) the prosecutor vindictively increased the length of the defendant's recommended sentence under the plea deal offered to him after the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. MolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. State v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API